What Is Delhi Agreement 1952

Although the agreement called for the repatriation of Russian-speaking biharis to Bangladesh, the Pakistani government withdrew its promise to relocate the Community to Pakistan. [6] This led to the stateless Pakistani community stranded in Bangladesh. Kashmiri government officials texted with indian government officials and reached an agreement to approve key decisions of the Constituent Assembly of the J-K State. This agreement later became known as the Delhi Agreement, 1952. The main features of this agreement were that the treaty entered into force on 8 August 1973 and expired on 1 July 1974. Under the agreement, UNHCR oversaw the repatriation of citizens from Bangladesh and Pakistan. According to the UN, 121,695 Bengalis have been transferred from Pakistan to Bangladesh. Among them are senior Bengal officials and the military. 108,744 civilians and non-Bengali officials were transferred from Bangladesh to Pakistan.

[4] India released 6,500 Pakistani PoWs, most of whom were transported by train to Pakistan. In 1974, General Niazi was the last Pakistani officer to be symbolically returned by the Wagah border. [4] The Delhi Agreement was a trilateral agreement signed on 28 August 1973 between India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. and only ratified by India and Pakistan. [1] It allowed the repatriation of prisoners of war and interned officials held in the three countries after Bangladesh`s war of liberation in 1971. The agreement was criticized because Pakistan did not repatriate Urdu spokesmen to Bangladesh and failed to bring to justice 195 high-ranking military personnel accused of being admitted to the war. [2] There was total agreement on the position of the Sadar-i-Riyasat; Although the Sadar-i-Riyasat was chosen by state law, it had to be recognized as such by the Indian president before its installation; In other Indian states, the head of state was appointed by the president and, as such, his candidate, but the person who was to be appointed head had to be an acceptable person to the government of that state; No one who is not acceptable to the government can be pushed on the state as head of state. The difference in the case of Kashmir lies solely in the fact that Sadar-i-Riyasat is elected primarily by the legislative branch of the state itself, instead of being a candidate of the government and the president of India. With regard to the powers and functions of the Sadar-i-Riyasat, the following argument was agreed upon by mutual agreement among the PoWs, 195 Pakistani military officers detained in India were identified as the main suspects of war crimes.

Pakistan insisted that they be released as one of its main demands. She urged several Muslim countries to refuse recognition of Bangladesh until the release of the 195 officers. [7] India preferred their repatriation to Pakistan. In the text of the agreement, Bangladeshi Foreign Minister Kamal Hossain said he would remain in office during the president`s joy; With regard to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India, it was recognized that, because of the existence of the State Board of Directors, which was the highest judicial authority in the state, the Supreme Court should have only jurisdiction on appeal at this time; Pakistan`s refusal to return the stateless spokesmen of Urdu to Bangladesh remains a difficult point in relations between Bangladesh and Pakistan. subject to the above provisions, the head of state is appointed head of state for a five-year term from the moment he takes office; the head of state is a person recognized by the President of the Union on the recommendation of the legislative branch of the State; by M J Aslam Many was written on August 9, 1953, the abduction of… he may resign by writing to the President at his address; by M J Aslam Any argument against Article 35, paragraph A, of the Constitution of India in… the EU government has agreed that the State has a separate flag in addition to the Union flag, but the State Government has agreed that the flag will not be a rival to the Union Flag; it was also recognized that the Union flag in Jammu and Kashmir should have the same status and position as in the rest of India, but for historical reasons related to the struggle for

Portfolio
Kontaktujte mě
Zpět na začátek
breaker